F1 News, Reports and Race Results

Ferrari reviewing 'processes' after Leclerc Q3 tyre blunder

Ferrari boss Mattia Binotto says the Italian outfit is reviewing the process that led to its wrong decision to fit Charles Leclerc's car with the intermediate tyre in Q3 in Brazil.

In last Friday's qualifying session at Interlagos, when the remaining ten car lined up in the pit lane ahead of the final shootout, Leclerc was the only driver shod with Pirelli's semi-wet compound.

All of the Monegasque's rivals - even teammate Carlos Sainz - had opted for the soft rubber, leaving the Ferrari driver as the odd man out.

The Scuderia's ill-fated strategic decision proved to be another gaffe in a long lost of mistakes made by the Italian outfit this season, and which have costed the team dearly.

Realizing its mistake, Ferrari then added insult to injury when it ordered Leclerc to pit just as he was set to begin his first timed flyer, the Monegasque responding to his crew over the radio with a sarcastic "beautiful!"

Thereafter, Leclerc's hopes of fighting for pole were ruined by a red flag triggered by George Russel's stricken Mercedes.

Ferrari initially defended its tyre choice, arguing that its weather radar had indicated that rain was just a minute away.

"Obviously, when you’ve got such weather conditions, it’s always a lottery and the fact that Kevin [Magnussen] was on pole or [Lewis] Hamilton eighth on the grid or Perez ninth is proving that it is a lottery," said Binotto after last Sunday's Brazilian Grand Prix.

"But we made it [the decision] wrong, because he was the only one on the intermediate at the time and not on slicks."

©Ferrari

But beyond the ill-informed decision itself, Ferrari's focus is the process by which it had been chosen.

"Those type of mistakes in such a lottery situation may always happen and they could also turn into the right decision as well because it is only a weather change maybe a minute after what happened," he said.

"But what I am looking at together with the team is what were the processes that brought us to such a decision which I think is more important than the decision itself and was it right or wrong.

"Why are we doing that when others didn’t?"

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Michael Delaney

Recent Posts

Leclerc: Adding Newey to Ferrari’s team 'would be amazing'

Charles Leclerc admits that adding Adrian Newey to Ferrari’s already “incredible” team would be “amazing”,…

1 hour ago

Sainz: Audi track record in motorsport ‘a very important asset’

Carlos Sainz admits that the Volkswagen group’s success in motorsport – be it with VW,…

2 hours ago

Ricciardo: No point in clearing air unless Stroll accepts blame

Daniel Ricciardo was expecting a ‘clear the air’ talk with Lance Stroll after the latter’s…

4 hours ago

Verstappen respects Newey's choice: 'Not dramatic' for Red Bull

Max Verstappen says he respects Adrian Newey’s decision to part ways with Red Bull but…

5 hours ago

Miami GP: Thursday's build-up in pictures

We’re on the eve of another adrenaline-pumping weekend of action in Florida, with Formula 1's…

16 hours ago

Perez: Red Bull ‘in a great place’ despite Newey departure

Sergio Perez believes Red Bull Racing will be in a great place despite the departure…

17 hours ago