F1 News, Reports and Race Results

Ferrari reviewing 'processes' after Leclerc Q3 tyre blunder

Ferrari boss Mattia Binotto says the Italian outfit is reviewing the process that led to its wrong decision to fit Charles Leclerc's car with the intermediate tyre in Q3 in Brazil.

In last Friday's qualifying session at Interlagos, when the remaining ten car lined up in the pit lane ahead of the final shootout, Leclerc was the only driver shod with Pirelli's semi-wet compound.

All of the Monegasque's rivals - even teammate Carlos Sainz - had opted for the soft rubber, leaving the Ferrari driver as the odd man out.

The Scuderia's ill-fated strategic decision proved to be another gaffe in a long lost of mistakes made by the Italian outfit this season, and which have costed the team dearly.

Realizing its mistake, Ferrari then added insult to injury when it ordered Leclerc to pit just as he was set to begin his first timed flyer, the Monegasque responding to his crew over the radio with a sarcastic "beautiful!"

Thereafter, Leclerc's hopes of fighting for pole were ruined by a red flag triggered by George Russel's stricken Mercedes.

Ferrari initially defended its tyre choice, arguing that its weather radar had indicated that rain was just a minute away.

"Obviously, when you’ve got such weather conditions, it’s always a lottery and the fact that Kevin [Magnussen] was on pole or [Lewis] Hamilton eighth on the grid or Perez ninth is proving that it is a lottery," said Binotto after last Sunday's Brazilian Grand Prix.

"But we made it [the decision] wrong, because he was the only one on the intermediate at the time and not on slicks."

©Ferrari

But beyond the ill-informed decision itself, Ferrari's focus is the process by which it had been chosen.

"Those type of mistakes in such a lottery situation may always happen and they could also turn into the right decision as well because it is only a weather change maybe a minute after what happened," he said.

"But what I am looking at together with the team is what were the processes that brought us to such a decision which I think is more important than the decision itself and was it right or wrong.

"Why are we doing that when others didn’t?"

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Michael Delaney

Recent Posts

Nine-year-old Jack Wolff claims first karting championship

There was another Wolff celebrating a a win, and even a championship, last weekend –…

3 hours ago

Stella reveals McLaren’s ‘clear agenda’ to unlock Piastri

Oscar Piastri appears stuck in a relative rut when it comes to his current performance…

4 hours ago

Red Bull lifts lid on ‘complex issue’ impacting Verstappen

There is something lurking beneath the surface of Max Verstappen’s Red Bull RB22 — and…

6 hours ago

Ferrari pays its respects to the American people

Five days after the 9-11 terrorist attacks that had taken place in the US in…

8 hours ago

Formula 1 unveils 2027 calendar, and Monaco GP Sprint event

Formula 1 has officially unveiled its 24-race calendar for the 2027 season, headlined by a…

9 hours ago

Colapinto: Madrid ‘probably my best race weekend’ in F1

Franco Colapinto reckons that his Spanish Grand Prix weekend was his best race weekend yet…

10 hours ago