F1 News, Reports and Race Results

Ferrari reviewing 'processes' after Leclerc Q3 tyre blunder

Ferrari boss Mattia Binotto says the Italian outfit is reviewing the process that led to its wrong decision to fit Charles Leclerc's car with the intermediate tyre in Q3 in Brazil.

In last Friday's qualifying session at Interlagos, when the remaining ten car lined up in the pit lane ahead of the final shootout, Leclerc was the only driver shod with Pirelli's semi-wet compound.

All of the Monegasque's rivals - even teammate Carlos Sainz - had opted for the soft rubber, leaving the Ferrari driver as the odd man out.

The Scuderia's ill-fated strategic decision proved to be another gaffe in a long lost of mistakes made by the Italian outfit this season, and which have costed the team dearly.

Realizing its mistake, Ferrari then added insult to injury when it ordered Leclerc to pit just as he was set to begin his first timed flyer, the Monegasque responding to his crew over the radio with a sarcastic "beautiful!"

Thereafter, Leclerc's hopes of fighting for pole were ruined by a red flag triggered by George Russel's stricken Mercedes.

Ferrari initially defended its tyre choice, arguing that its weather radar had indicated that rain was just a minute away.

"Obviously, when you’ve got such weather conditions, it’s always a lottery and the fact that Kevin [Magnussen] was on pole or [Lewis] Hamilton eighth on the grid or Perez ninth is proving that it is a lottery," said Binotto after last Sunday's Brazilian Grand Prix.

"But we made it [the decision] wrong, because he was the only one on the intermediate at the time and not on slicks."

©Ferrari

But beyond the ill-informed decision itself, Ferrari's focus is the process by which it had been chosen.

"Those type of mistakes in such a lottery situation may always happen and they could also turn into the right decision as well because it is only a weather change maybe a minute after what happened," he said.

"But what I am looking at together with the team is what were the processes that brought us to such a decision which I think is more important than the decision itself and was it right or wrong.

"Why are we doing that when others didn’t?"

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Michael Delaney

Recent Posts

Belgian GP: Friday's action in pictures

Formula 1 kicked off its Belgian GP weekend in earnest on Friday at Spa-Francorchamps, and…

11 hours ago

Alpine addresses Gasly crash and consequences in Spa FP2

Alpine has moved quickly to ease concerns after Pierre Gasly's heavy crash in Friday's second…

11 hours ago

Verstappen says ‘real gap’ to Mercedes exposed in FP2

Max Verstappen opened the Belgian Grand Prix weekend by topping the first practice session, but…

12 hours ago

Antonelli hails ‘massive turnaround’ between Spa Friday sessions

Kimi Antonelli believes Mercedes found the answers it had been searching for after a dramatic…

13 hours ago

Belgian GP: Antonelli puts Mercedes on top, Norris P2

Kimi Antonelli upped the pace in Friday’s second practice at Spa-Francorchamps, the young Mercedes driver…

14 hours ago

Belgian Grand Prix Free Practice 2 - Results

Full results from Free Practice 2 for the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps, round 10…

14 hours ago