F1 News, Reports and Race Results

FIA rejects McLaren's request for Canadian GP 'right of review'

The FIA has rejected the McLaren team's request for a right to review the penalty handed to Lando Norris in the Canadian Grand Prix for "unsportsmanlike behaviour".

Norris was hit with a five-second time penalty in Montreal for slowing under the Safety Car regime during the race to create a gap to his teammate Oscar Piastri to accommodate an upcoming double-stacked pitstop by the McLaren pair.

The maneuver was investigated by the stewards who ultimately believed that it had impeded the Williams of Alex Albon and that it constituted a case of "unsportsmanlike behaviour" on the part of the British driver.

The sanction promptly threw Norris out of the points, which encouraged McLaren to dispute the penalty by submitting to the FIA "significant, new and relevant" information.

The team argued, among other things, that previous discussions had led to the understanding that Norris' conduct was within the norms of what has been accepted in the past, while also stating, with evidence, that Albon had not lost and positions as a result of what Norris had done.

McLaren also provided video, audio and GPS evidence involving eight other instances where a car made a gap that had a negative impact on a competitor without incurring a penalty.

Read also:

In a hearing that took place at the Red Bull Ring on Sunday morning, the FIA concluded that the evidence submitted by McLaren did not bring anything new, significant or relevant to the case involving Norris.

"Discussions, informal "gentlemen's agreements" etc cannot become binding unless and until they find their way into regulatory format, despite the good intentions of the parties concerned," said the FIA in a statement on Sundy.

"Officials may only clarify, through the medium, for example, of Race Director's notes, certain matters, in accordance with Article 12.2.1.i. Such clarifications cannot contradict an existing regulation.

"The citing of previous cases is, in our view, irrelevant to this particular case. Whilst there are cases cited where no penalty was applied, and cases cited by Williams where penalties were applied, each incident was different in some aspect, albeit sometimes in a minor way.

"What is most important to note is that the original penalty was applied in relation to what was considered an unfair action. None of the cases cited, address that issue of unfairness."

The matter is not subject to further appeal.

"We respect the FIA and Stewards' decision to uphold Lando Norris' 5-second time penalty at the 2023 Canadian Grand Prix," McLaren said.

"However, we believe that we provided sufficient new, significant and relevant evidence to warrant a 'right of review'.

"We accept the Stewards' decision that this evidence did not meet their requirements. Whilst it is not the outcome we hoped for, we thank the Stewards for their time and collaboration."

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Michael Delaney

Recent Posts

Mekies: ‘We all agree’ F1 must bring back flat-out qualifying

Red Bull team principal Laurent Mekies has made it clear: Formula 1 must rediscover the…

4 hours ago

‘Rusty, me?’: Perez fires back at Andretti’s Cadillac claim

Sergio Perez isn’t taking lightly the suggestion that his return to Formula 1 with Cadillac…

5 hours ago

Formula 1’s heartfelt gift to new dad Fernando Alonso

While Aston Martin’s F1 car is currently giving Fernando Alonso some massive engine vibrations and…

6 hours ago

Hill says unhappy Verstappen ‘should stop and do something else’

For a driver who has spent years bending F1 to his will, Max Verstappen suddenly…

8 hours ago

‘He’s up against it’: Brundle fears Sainz facing career dead end in F1

For Carlos Sainz, what was meant to be a strong second season at Williams is…

9 hours ago

Alonso’s brutal verdict: ‘High-speed corners now charging stations’

Two-time world champion Fernando Alonso has delivered another withering verdict on Formula 1’s 2026 regulations…

10 hours ago