F1 News, Reports and Race Results

Haas slams proposed 2026 rule change as a ‘killer’ for small teams

Haas team principal Ayao Komatsu has expressed his strong opposition to a potential regulation change for the 2026 F1 season that he believes would be a “killer” for the sport’s smaller outfits.

The proposed rule would mandate that teams finishing in the top five of the Constructors' Championship must design and manufacture their own components.

Komatsu warns that such a rule would jeopardize the future of smaller teams like Haas, which rely on cost-effective partnerships and unique business models to remain competitive.

The proposed regulation, reportedly supported by Aston Martin, Williams, and Alpine according to Auto Motor und Sport, aims to level the playing field by enforcing greater self-sufficiency among teams.

Under this plan, a top five team would have a three-year period to develop the capability to produce all components in-house.

Haas currently operates on a unique business model, outsourcing the construction of its chassis to Dallara and purchasing permitted parts from Ferrari.

This approach, championed by the US outfit’s former team boss Guenther Steiner, allows the team to compete at a competitive level despite its relatively limited resources.

Read also:

However, the proposed regulation change could force Haas to abandon this model and invest heavily in in-house engineering and manufacturing capabilities, a significant negative for Haas should the ruling come to pass.

“It would be a killer for the small teams,” insisted Komatsu. “If Formula 1 wants as many teams as possible to be competitive, then it will reject this rule.

“What better thing could happen to the sport than David winning against Goliath? What fan cares whether the gearbox or the suspension comes from Ferrari or from us?

Komatsu defended Haas’ operational model, highlighting that it does not offer any financial advantages under the sport’s cost-cap rules.

“We are given a nominal equivalent value in the budget cap for the components we buy. This is so high that we have no advantage,” he explained.

This clarification underscores that Haas’ reliance on third-party manufacturing is a necessity, not a luxury, for the smallest team on the grid.

Haas’ recent technical alliance with Toyota, for example, was born out of the need to enhance its simulator program and conduct testing of prior car models – tasks it lacked the staff and resources to perform independently.

Forcing Haas to produce all its components in-house would challenge the team’s business model to the point of unsustainability.

As Komatsu pointed out, without its partnerships with companies like Dallara and Ferrari, Haas would not have been able to join Formula 1 in 2016, let alone compete effectively today.

Despite its resource limitations, Haas has steadily improved its performance, becoming a credible midfield contender. The team is currently fighting for sixth place in the Constructors’ standings, a notable achievement given its financial constraints.

However, Haas’ modus operandi has raised eyebrows among its rivals. Some teams argue that partnerships like Haas-Ferrari or Visa Cash App RB’s relationship with Red Bull blur the lines of fairness in Formula 1.

McLaren CEO Zak Brown has been especially vocal, criticizing Red Bull’s dual-team structure for its potential to create an unfair advantage.

“I believe it’s a serious issue for the fairness of the sport, for the fans,” Brown said. “That’s why it’s pretty much not allowed in any other form of major sport.

“It might give someone an unfair advantage, and I think that’s something we need to tackle with the sport quickly.”

The proposed 2026 regulation strikes at the heart of what makes Formula 1 compelling for many fans—the underdog story. Komatsu emphasized that the sport benefits from smaller teams punching above their weight.

“What better thing could happen to the sport than David winning against Goliath?” he reiterated, reinforcing the importance of competitive diversity in Formula 1.

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Phillip van Osten

Motor racing was a backdrop from the outset in Phillip van Osten's life. Born in Southern California, Phillip grew up with the sights and sounds of fast cars thanks to his father, Dick van Osten, an editor and writer for Auto Speed and Sport and Motor Trend. Phillip's passion for racing grew even more when his family moved to Europe and he became acquainted with the extraordinary world of Grand Prix racing. He was an early contributor to the monthly French F1i Magazine, often providing a historic or business perspective on Formula 1's affairs. In 2012, he co-authored along with fellow journalist Pierre Van Vliet the English-language adaptation of a limited edition book devoted to the great Belgian driver Jacky Ickx. He also authored "The American Legacy in Formula 1", a book which recounts the trials and tribulations of American drivers in Grand Prix racing. Phillip is also a commentator for Belgian broadcaster Be.TV for the US Indycar series.

Recent Posts

Theo Pourchaire joins Mercedes as F1 development driver

The revolving door of Formula 1 talent has just swung wide open for one of…

11 hours ago

Hill returns to Williams in ambassador role in title anniversary year

Thirty years after conquering the Formula 1 world title with Williams, Damon Hill is heading…

12 hours ago

Sainz's clear message to F1 chiefs: ‘Stay open-minded on rules'

Carlos Sainz has urged FIA and Formula One Management to keep an “open mind” over…

13 hours ago

Why ex-Red Bull drivers see Hadjar keeping pace with Verstappen

Isack Hadjar is facing the ultimate baptism of fire this season in F1: going wheel-to-wheel…

14 hours ago

The day Fangio went missing in Havana

The great Juan Manuel Fangio certainly enjoyed a storied motorsport career but the episode that…

16 hours ago

‘I want to win’ – Herta responds to Cadillac’s F2 expectations

Colton Herta has been handed a clear target by Cadillac ahead of his rookie FIA…

17 hours ago