FIA and F1 consider changes amid 2026 regulation backlash

Formula 1 and the FIA are set to review, along with the sport’s team, the series’ 2026 regulations amid growing concerns after last weekend’s Australian Grand Prix over how the new hybrid-powered cars are performing on track.

What was meant to herald a revolutionary era in Formula 1 instead sparked unease across the paddock in Melbourne, with questions mounting over whether the new power units are forcing drivers into unnatural and potentially unsafe racing behaviours.

The sport’s stakeholders plan to reassess the rules after next weekend’s Chinese Grand Prix, once more data is available on how the machines actually behave in competitive conditions.

Drivers Sound the Alarm on Energy Management

The controversy centres on the new 50-50 hybrid power unit formula, which splits performance equally between electric and internal combustion energy.

While intended to highlight cutting-edge technology, many drivers have complained that battery management has become an overriding factor, dictating driving style rather than skill.

For Lando Norris, the implications extend beyond performance.

“You can have a 30, 40, 50 km/h speed [difference],” he said. “When someone hits someone at that speed, you’re going to fly, you’re going to go over the fence and you’re going to do a lot of damage to yourself and maybe to others.

“That’s a pretty horrible thing to think about.”

Even as the Melbourne race offered exciting overtaking, many in the paddock argue that the spectacle comes with an uncomfortable safety trade-off.

‘An ace up our sleeves’

Despite the backlash, Formula 1 and FIA leaders have chosen not to rush changes before the season, instead gathering real-world data from the opening rounds.

The governing body’s single-seater director, Nikolas Tombazis, outlined the approach:

“The teams’ unanimous position was that we should stick to the current arrangements for the first few races and to review the matter when we have a bit more data,” he explained.

“Our intention is after China to be reviewing the energy management situation.

“We have a few aces up our sleeves on that, which we didn’t want to introduce ahead of the first race as a kneejerk reaction, and which we will review with the teams after China.”

Potential adjustments under discussion include tweaking the balance between energy harvesting and deployment, adjusting electrical boost limits, or even increasing combustion engine output to restore performance equilibrium.

Team Bosses Urge Patience

Several F1 team principals are urging restraint, warning that hasty changes could backfire.

“I think the worst thing we can do is change it and make it worse,” warned Williams boss James Vowles.

Toto Wolff highlighted the importance of catering -first and foremost – to the sport’s fans.

Read also:

• Norris critical again of F1 new era after Melbourne race: ‘It’s chaos’

“I didn’t hear any of the drivers speaking particularly good of the last cars and saying it was the best car,” commented the Mercedes chief.

“So we tend to be very nostalgic in looking at past events. But clearly, we are all stakeholders of the sport. We need to have a great spectacle, the best cars in the world and the best drivers, and being exciting for the fans.

“That’s why we just need to look at the product.”

If urgent tweaks are agreed upon following the review after Shanghai, the changes could appear as soon as the Japanese Grand Prix later this month.

For Formula 1’s new era, the first warning signs are clear: act too slowly, and criticism may mount; act too fast, and the delicate balance of the new regulations could unravel.

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via X and Facebook