Piastri ‘mind-blown’ by Gasly Monaco podium reinstatement

McLaren’s Oscar Piastri admits to being “mind-blown” by the FIA’s decision to reinstate Pierre Gasly’s Monaco Grand Prix podium – a ruling that has scrambled finishing positions and left several drivers questioning the very logic of the stewards’ decision.

The verdict was triggered by a newly uncovered data discrepancy from Formula One Management’s (FOM) official timekeeping systems, which miscalculated entry speeds in Monaco's famously tight pit lane.

That technical discrepancy did not just affect Alpine. It also implicated multiple drivers who were penalised under the same system.

A systemic mess in the pitlane

Gasly was elevated from seventh to third, reclaiming a podium that had already been absorbed into the official race narrative.

But the ripple effect was immediate: Oscar Piastri, who had served a penalty during the race and consequently dropped behind Gasly, was demoted from fourth to fifth.

Others, including George Russell, were hit even harder, with the Mercedes drivers’ race collapsing entirely after a drive-through compounded his earlier penalty issues.

For Piastri, the logic of the reversal was difficult to process – especially given that he had already paid the sporting price on track.

"I'm pretty mind-blown by the decision," Piastri said. "When other people have been penalised for the same thing and served a penalty in the race, how you can then change one penalty, knowing that at least five or six other racers have been impacted by that, is astonishing.

“I've obviously lost the position, but I can only imagine how George is feeling. I could not believe my eyes.

"I lost the position to Pierre because I served the penalty. Technically I should be P3, but then technically George should be P3. The whole thing is now a mess.

“It's quite the predicament they've got themselves into. I don't know how you get yourself out of that one, because now the precedent as it is, is you don't serve the penalty, you take it to court, wait probably a few months to decide the race, and who the hell wants to go racing like that?

“Perplexed is the word I would use."

An F1 paddock demanding clarity

The FIA’s correction has opened an uncomfortable philosophical question for Formula 1: what happens when enforcement systems fail after penalties have already been served?

McLaren team principal Andrea Stella acknowledged the complexity, stopping short of outright condemnation but making clear the team’s concern about precedent.

"The situation whereby cars that received a penalty served a penalty in the race, some other cars didn't, and then we find ourselves in a condition that some of the cars that didn't have the penalty removed, is a very difficult case," he said, quoted by Motorsport.com. 

"We have already lodged an intention to appeal. We will use the time that we have available, and we will confirm or not confirm the intention to appeal. But for the moment I would refrain from commenting too much other than saying that this is a very complex case, and we do feel that we should consider appealing."

Red Bull, also caught in the fallout after Isack Hadjar lost a podium position, echoed the confusion. Team principal Laurent Mekies warned that the sport risks undermining its own credibility if race results are no longer final at the chequered flag.

"We are a bit confused because at the end of the day, we are talking about non-appealable penalties, and you are racing around cars that are receiving non-appealable penalties, and you adapt your racing also to that," Mekies said.

• Read also: Red Bull and McLaren set to appeal FIA’s Gasly Monaco verdict

"Some cars actually served their penalties there. I think regardless of what we think as a team, and we defend our competitive positions, I think it is very important for the fans that we get moving forward with the right clarity about the race result at the time when the race is finishing."

For Piastri, the issue is no longer just about lost positions – but about the integrity of how those positions are decided in the first place.

In a sport where milliseconds define legacy, the Monaco aftermath has exposed something far more fragile than lap times: trust in the system that measures them.

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via X and Facebook