F1 News, Reports and Race Results

Ferrari: No team orders in Canadian GP would have been 'stupid'

Ferrari boss Frederic Vasseur says the Scuderia would have been "stupid" not to impose team orders and let its drivers fight each other in last weekend's Canadian Grand Prix.

Given Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz's relatively lowly starting positions in P10 and P11, Ferrari opted to put the pair on a one-stop strategy when they moved up to fourth and fifth respectively as a result of not pitting under the early Safety Car period.

But to uphold their momentum in the race, Sainz was told not to attack Leclerc but to work with his teammate to ensure they had the best chance of keeping their immediate pursuers at bay.

Vasseur insisted the call was not a display of favouritism towards Leclerc.

©Ferrari

"No, it wasn’t that we wanted to protect someone, it was just strategy at this stage of the race was to push and to avoid losing time fighting together," he explained.

"We were trying to extend to create the gap to Ocon and Norris perhaps, I don’t know [actually it was Perez and Ocon]. To fight together and to lose time would’ve been stupid."

Vasseur admitted that Ferrari's decision – fueled by Leclerc and Sainz's comments – not to pit its drivers under the Safety Car had been a gamble, albeit one that worked out.

"You always have some hesitation but what is quite obvious is that most of them told us that the pace was much better for them, when they were stuck in the traffic the potential was there," he said.

"They said ‘just give us clean air’. The best way to do it was to not pit.

"For sure it’s kind of a gamble because if you have another Safety Car 18 laps later it’s a bit more difficult, but it was a good call, the best way to recover."

While Ferrari's race execution was perfect, the team's management of its qualifying session on Saturday was once again a confusing affair, especially for Leclerc who failed to make the top-ten shootout.

The Monegasque had immediately requested a set of soft tyres when he took to the track on inters at the start of Q2 as conditions were quickly improving.

But he was overruled by his team who asked him to first bank a lap on the inters. Ferrari eventually brought Leclerc in for a quick inters-to-softs turnaround, but too late relative to the now worsening track conditions.

Leclerc was left fuming after the session and publicly blasted his team for its ill-timed strategy calls and for "making life difficult" for him.

Vasseur said the team would meet on Tuesday to discuss events, but insisted there was no lingering ire on the part of Leclerc after he was explained during Ferrari's post-qualifying debrief how the team had managed his efforts.

"We have to think about what happened," explained Vasseur. "We will have a meeting to discuss about it on Tuesday to fix it.

"You can always do a better job. But it is true also that the [impression] that you have 10 seconds after qualifying is not always the best one.

"We had a good discussion with Charles. We gave him the global picture of the situation; what happened during the session, and it was much more calm."

©Ferrari

Vasseur ultimately defended Ferrari's strategy, insisting an immediate switch from inters to softs would have caused an unproductive delay.

"At this stage the rain was coming, and we wanted to put a time on the board as soon as possible," he said.

"If you pit at the end of lap one to put a set of softs on, then you have two laps to warm up the tyres and you postpone your first flying lap for five minutes. It was not the right strategy at this stage.

"I think the confusion came from the fact that he probably didn't get the global picture of the quali and so on," added the Frenchman.

"We have probably to improve some areas so that he has to put himself in our shoes sometimes.

"We can't say that we did a good job [in qualifying]. I think the pace was mega, but we finished 10/11. So, it means something went wrong."

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Phillip van Osten

Motor racing was a backdrop from the outset in Phillip van Osten's life. Born in Southern California, Phillip grew up with the sights and sounds of fast cars thanks to his father, Dick van Osten, an editor and writer for Auto Speed and Sport and Motor Trend. Phillip's passion for racing grew even more when his family moved to Europe and he became acquainted with the extraordinary world of Grand Prix racing. He was an early contributor to the monthly French F1i Magazine, often providing a historic or business perspective on Formula 1's affairs. In 2012, he co-authored along with fellow journalist Pierre Van Vliet the English-language adaptation of a limited edition book devoted to the great Belgian driver Jacky Ickx. He also authored "The American Legacy in Formula 1", a book which recounts the trials and tribulations of American drivers in Grand Prix racing. Phillip is also a commentator for Belgian broadcaster Be.TV for the US Indycar series.

Recent Posts

Marko: ‘No chance at all’ for Red Bull in Las Vegas

Helmut Marko believes that Red Bull and Max Verstappen are unlikely to challenge for victory…

6 hours ago

GM revives bid to join F1 with accelerated talks for 2026 entry

Automotive giant General Motors is reportedly back in the game as a potential entrant in…

8 hours ago

Las Vegas GP: Thursday's action in pictures

The opening day of running at the Las Vegas GP was a smooth but chilly…

9 hours ago

Williams' headaches persist into Vegas practice

Williams is continuing to fight uphill battles this weekend in Las Vegas as a knock-on…

10 hours ago

Ferrari's Sainz 'not satisfied with where we are' in Vegas

It was a solid start to the Las Vegas weekend for Ferrari with Carlos Sainz…

11 hours ago

Norris labels McLaren long-run pace ‘shocking’ in chilly Vegas

Lando Norris didn’t hold back in his assessment of McLaren’s performance on the opening day…

12 hours ago