F1 News, Reports and Race Results

McLaren’s Piastri track limits protest deemed ‘inadmissable’

McLaren's bid to overturn Oscar Piastri's track limits penalty in qualifying at the Austrian Grand Prix has been rejected by the FIA stewards who have deemed the protest as “inadmissible”.

McLaren argued that the deletion of Piastri's fastest lap in Q3, which would have placed the Aussie third on Sunday’s grid, was unfair, citing a lack of conclusive evidence.

The team specifically challenged the clarity of the footage used by the stewards to make their decision.

They argued that blurry images from a trackside camera and a helicopter, potentially obscured by shadows, were insufficient to definitively prove that Piastri had exceeded track limits at the Red Bull Ring’s Turn 6.

“Our approach to racing is we don't want what we don't deserve,” explained McLaren team boss Andrea Stella.

“But when the penalty is so harsh, then in the interest of sport - it's not in the interest of McLaren - there needs to be clear evidence.”

Unfortunately for McLaren, the stewards never reached the stage of evaluating their own evidence and opted to dismiss the team’s formal complaint on procedural grounds.

FIA emphasized that in accordance with the International Sporting Code, decisions made by the race stewards are final and cannot be appealed. This regulation aims to ensure the stewards' authority on the track remains unchallenged.

Secondly, the FIA pointed out specific flaws within the protest document itself. For instance, the document was addressed to the Clerk of the Course, who oversees the race logistics, rather than the Chairperson of the Stewards, who holds the power to review penalties.

Additionally, the document failed to mention the specific regulations McLaren believed were violated by the penalty, who the protest was directed against (likely the stewards), and what specific aspects of the penalty decision McLaren contested.

“We wanted to look at the evidence whereby the car was beyond the track limits beyond any reasonable doubt,” added a visibly unhappy Stella. “I cannot say that the beyond reasonable doubt is satisfied.”

“In this case, it's just everything blurred and affected by the shadow.

“It's quite a lot to come here, compete, put together qualifying laps, and when the penalty is so severe, like having the lap deleted, then we need to make sure that the penalty is enforced beyond any reasonable doubt.”

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Michael Delaney

Recent Posts

Senna and Penske, a near match made in heaven

On this day in 1992, Ayrton Senna enjoyed a secret track day with Team Penske…

55 mins ago

F1i's 2025 Driver Rankings: The grid's top 10 best performers

  In 2025, we saw a defiant masterclass from a driver in an erratic Red…

2 hours ago

Williams goes with the 'flow' for 2026 pre-season look

The fans have spoken! Williams has unveiled testing livery chosen by its supporters for its…

3 hours ago

Verstappen slams Red Bull for ruthless Lawson decision

Max Verstappen has reopened one of Red Bull’s most uncomfortable debates of the 2025 Formula…

4 hours ago

F1 bracing for 2026 engine controversy over ‘thermal loophole’

Formula 1 is bracing for its first major political firestorm of the 2026 era, with…

5 hours ago

Vasseur calls for ‘better job everywhere’ to save Hamilton era

Ferrari are bracing for a searching winter of self-examination as Fred Vasseur made it clear…

6 hours ago