F1 News, Reports and Race Results

McLaren’s Piastri track limits protest deemed ‘inadmissable’

McLaren's bid to overturn Oscar Piastri's track limits penalty in qualifying at the Austrian Grand Prix has been rejected by the FIA stewards who have deemed the protest as “inadmissible”.

McLaren argued that the deletion of Piastri's fastest lap in Q3, which would have placed the Aussie third on Sunday’s grid, was unfair, citing a lack of conclusive evidence.

The team specifically challenged the clarity of the footage used by the stewards to make their decision.

They argued that blurry images from a trackside camera and a helicopter, potentially obscured by shadows, were insufficient to definitively prove that Piastri had exceeded track limits at the Red Bull Ring’s Turn 6.

“Our approach to racing is we don't want what we don't deserve,” explained McLaren team boss Andrea Stella.

“But when the penalty is so harsh, then in the interest of sport - it's not in the interest of McLaren - there needs to be clear evidence.”

Unfortunately for McLaren, the stewards never reached the stage of evaluating their own evidence and opted to dismiss the team’s formal complaint on procedural grounds.

FIA emphasized that in accordance with the International Sporting Code, decisions made by the race stewards are final and cannot be appealed. This regulation aims to ensure the stewards' authority on the track remains unchallenged.

Secondly, the FIA pointed out specific flaws within the protest document itself. For instance, the document was addressed to the Clerk of the Course, who oversees the race logistics, rather than the Chairperson of the Stewards, who holds the power to review penalties.

Additionally, the document failed to mention the specific regulations McLaren believed were violated by the penalty, who the protest was directed against (likely the stewards), and what specific aspects of the penalty decision McLaren contested.

“We wanted to look at the evidence whereby the car was beyond the track limits beyond any reasonable doubt,” added a visibly unhappy Stella. “I cannot say that the beyond reasonable doubt is satisfied.”

“In this case, it's just everything blurred and affected by the shadow.

“It's quite a lot to come here, compete, put together qualifying laps, and when the penalty is so severe, like having the lap deleted, then we need to make sure that the penalty is enforced beyond any reasonable doubt.”

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Michael Delaney

Recent Posts

Alpine double-podium in Brazil could deliver $30 million windfall

Alpine’s remarkable double podium at the São Paulo Grand Prix with Esteban Ocon and Pierre…

10 hours ago

F1i's Driver Ratings for the 2024 São Paulo GP

Alexander Albon, Williams (Did Not Start): 5.5/10 Alex Albon is definitely going through something of…

11 hours ago

Jos Verstappen rips British media after Brazilian Max fest

Jos Verstappen wasted no time after his son spectacular win at the São Paulo Grand…

13 hours ago

Leclerc left with ‘mixed feelings’ after disappointing Sao Paulo GP

Charles Leclerc's weekend in Sao Paulo was unfortunately a stark contrast to Ferrari's recent triumphs…

14 hours ago

Back when Kimi knew exactly what he was doing

Twelve years ago on this day, Kimi Raikkonen took a popular win at the 2012…

16 hours ago

Mercedes fined for starting grid tyre pressure infringement

The Mercedes team was hit with a fine by the FIA after Sunday’s Sao Paulo…

17 hours ago