F1 News, Reports and Race Results

McLaren’s Piastri track limits protest deemed ‘inadmissable’

McLaren's bid to overturn Oscar Piastri's track limits penalty in qualifying at the Austrian Grand Prix has been rejected by the FIA stewards who have deemed the protest as “inadmissible”.

McLaren argued that the deletion of Piastri's fastest lap in Q3, which would have placed the Aussie third on Sunday’s grid, was unfair, citing a lack of conclusive evidence.

The team specifically challenged the clarity of the footage used by the stewards to make their decision.

They argued that blurry images from a trackside camera and a helicopter, potentially obscured by shadows, were insufficient to definitively prove that Piastri had exceeded track limits at the Red Bull Ring’s Turn 6.

“Our approach to racing is we don't want what we don't deserve,” explained McLaren team boss Andrea Stella.

“But when the penalty is so harsh, then in the interest of sport - it's not in the interest of McLaren - there needs to be clear evidence.”

Unfortunately for McLaren, the stewards never reached the stage of evaluating their own evidence and opted to dismiss the team’s formal complaint on procedural grounds.

FIA emphasized that in accordance with the International Sporting Code, decisions made by the race stewards are final and cannot be appealed. This regulation aims to ensure the stewards' authority on the track remains unchallenged.

Secondly, the FIA pointed out specific flaws within the protest document itself. For instance, the document was addressed to the Clerk of the Course, who oversees the race logistics, rather than the Chairperson of the Stewards, who holds the power to review penalties.

Additionally, the document failed to mention the specific regulations McLaren believed were violated by the penalty, who the protest was directed against (likely the stewards), and what specific aspects of the penalty decision McLaren contested.

“We wanted to look at the evidence whereby the car was beyond the track limits beyond any reasonable doubt,” added a visibly unhappy Stella. “I cannot say that the beyond reasonable doubt is satisfied.”

“In this case, it's just everything blurred and affected by the shadow.

“It's quite a lot to come here, compete, put together qualifying laps, and when the penalty is so severe, like having the lap deleted, then we need to make sure that the penalty is enforced beyond any reasonable doubt.”

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Michael Delaney

Recent Posts

The brutal mirror: Herbert’s no-filter advice for Lewis Hamilton

Few names in Formula 1 carry the same weight as Lewis Hamilton. Seven world titles.…

2 hours ago

Beltoise's one-off masterclass and 'Jour de Gloire'

One-time Grand Prix winner Jean-Pierre Beltoise was born on this day in 1937. The late…

4 hours ago

Rubber side up: Jos Verstappen’s Sunday somersault in Wallonia

Jos Verstappen’s efforts in this weekend’s  Rallye de Wallonie took a dramatic turn on Sunday…

4 hours ago

Mercedes ‘ticking all the boxes’ but Russell dismisses title hype

Three races into the 2026 season, and Kimi Antonelli and George Russell find themselves in…

5 hours ago

A grid of opportunity: BYD considers leap into Formula 1!

In Formula 1, whispers often travel faster than the cars themselves. And lately, one name…

6 hours ago

How Hadjar engineered his leap to ‘weird’ Red Bull seat

During his 2025 rookie season in F1, Isack Hadjar carried himself with a calm, almost…

8 hours ago