F1 News, Reports and Race Results

RB reveals root cause of why Barcelona upgrade missed the mark

RB had high hopes when it introduced a significant upgrade package for its VCARB 01 at last June’s Spanish Grand Prix, but the team has since identified the reason why its development fell short of expectations.

The Barcelona updates, aimed at solidifying RB’s position in the constructors' championship, were designed to elevate its car’s performance and address specific areas needing improvement, such as stability and balance.

But instead, the changes created new challenges, and compelled the team to initiate an extensive process to identify the root cause of the underperformance.

Initial suspicions pointed to a fluttering rear wing, but further analysis revealed that the real culprit was the new floor design introduced as part of the upgrade package.

"We had an update targeting certain benefits,” RB technical director Jody Egginton told Motorsport.com.

“We're still trying to get all the headline load improvements, but we were focusing a little bit still to get a bit more brake entry stability, a bit more rotation in the car, all the normal things."

Read also:

However, the team quickly realized that they hadn’t been able to extract the expected performance gains from the new package. Despite achieving the anticipated load improvements, the upgrade negatively impacted the car's balance, particularly in through-corner and through-speed phases.

"As a package, it was clear that we hadn't been able to extract everything from it, and although the load that we anticipated was there, we'd sort of decoupled the car in through-corner and through-speed balance more than we wanted," Egginton noted.

This decoupling meant that while the car generated the expected aerodynamic load, the trade-off was a loss of balance, which hindered overall performance.

The team's response was swift. They decided to roll back the floor update on one of their cars during the Austrian Grand Prix to conduct a back-to-back comparison.

Given that the Spielberg weekend was a sprint event with a unique parc ferme window, this allowed the team to experiment over two stages.

"There was no doubt that the load was in the package but, trading load against balance, we were not able to access that performance,” Egginton added.

“So we took the decision immediately to roll one car back and do a back-to-back in Austria - it was a two-stage experiment because the parc ferme window this year in sprint races opens up twice.

“We had two goes at it, bottomed it out. And then for Silverstone, we had a baseline aero config and essentially we'd rolled back the floor.”

Despite the disappointment, Egginton remains optimistic about the lessons learned from the experience. He acknowledged that while the floor design didn’t work as intended, it still contained valuable insights that could inform future developments.

"The floor is a one-piece thing with bits of it we liked, bits of it we didn't. You don't get the choice to split it up," he said.

RB technical director Jody Egginton.

This means that while some aspects of the new floor were beneficial, the overall package failed to deliver the desired performance.

"You bring the update to the first event, you've got things you want to learn, but we delved straight into it, did our washing, found the answer and moved on. So I'm quite happy with the process," he said, adding that while the team was disappointed not to access all the performance potential, the experience was still valuable.

"A lot of learning from that floor that we're not running, which we'll apply to the next floor because some aspects of it we like," Egginton continued.

"Most teams have [rolled back] at one point or another. To believe that you can attain everything is naive - if you're trying to develop this aggressively, it's just how it is."

"I'd be concerned if every single part got retained! I'd question that as 'are we sure, do we want to look at that again?' Because experimentally the likelihood of that is low."

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Phillip van Osten

Motor racing was a backdrop from the outset in Phillip van Osten's life. Born in Southern California, Phillip grew up with the sights and sounds of fast cars thanks to his father, Dick van Osten, an editor and writer for Auto Speed and Sport and Motor Trend. Phillip's passion for racing grew even more when his family moved to Europe and he became acquainted with the extraordinary world of Grand Prix racing. He was an early contributor to the monthly French F1i Magazine, often providing a historic or business perspective on Formula 1's affairs. In 2012, he co-authored along with fellow journalist Pierre Van Vliet the English-language adaptation of a limited edition book devoted to the great Belgian driver Jacky Ickx. He also authored "The American Legacy in Formula 1", a book which recounts the trials and tribulations of American drivers in Grand Prix racing. Phillip is also a commentator for Belgian broadcaster Be.TV for the US Indycar series.

Recent Posts

Marko: ‘No chance at all’ for Red Bull in Las Vegas

Helmut Marko believes that Red Bull and Max Verstappen are unlikely to challenge for victory…

5 hours ago

GM revives bid to join F1 with accelerated talks for 2026 entry

Automotive giant General Motors is reportedly back in the game as a potential entrant in…

6 hours ago

Las Vegas GP: Thursday's action in pictures

The opening day of running at the Las Vegas GP was a smooth but chilly…

8 hours ago

Williams' headaches persist into Vegas practice

Williams is continuing to fight uphill battles this weekend in Las Vegas as a knock-on…

9 hours ago

Ferrari's Sainz 'not satisfied with where we are' in Vegas

It was a solid start to the Las Vegas weekend for Ferrari with Carlos Sainz…

10 hours ago

Norris labels McLaren long-run pace ‘shocking’ in chilly Vegas

Lando Norris didn’t hold back in his assessment of McLaren’s performance on the opening day…

11 hours ago