F1 News, Reports and Race Results

F1 engine dispute heads for boiling point in key FIA meetings

This week, Formula 1’s engine manufacturer’s are heading into two crucial meetings with the FIA, both aimed at defusing – or detonating – the simmering dispute over compression ratios in the new-generation power units.

At stake is not just a measurement method, but competitive balance heading into the 2026 era.

Behind closed doors, engineers, regulators and manufacturer representatives are wrestling with a deceptively simple question: How exactly should an engine’s compression ratio be measured when it’s running hot?

The answer could redraw the competitive map before the new rules even fully take hold.

Two Meetings, One Pressure Cooker

According to a report from The Race, a first gathering scheduled for Monday is a technical workshop with engine specialists tasked with refining a framework for testing compression ratios under operating temperatures rather than ambient conditions.

On paper, it is a procedural discussion. In reality, it is anything but.

Then comes Thursday’s meeting of the Power Unit Advisory Committee (PUAC), where the topic is expected to escalate from technical theory to political decision-making.

The FIA is keen to draw a definitive line under the issue before the 2026 season begins, wary of another regulation grey area morphing into a multi-year advantage for a select few.

The controversy stems from suspicions that Mercedes – and possibly Red Bull – may have identified a way to exceed the nominal 16:1 compression limit once their engines reach race temperatures.

Read also:

Current compliance checks are conducted in cooler, ambient conditions, creating a potential discrepancy between what is legal in the garage and what happens at full throttle on track.

While no immediate rule rewrite appears imminent, the FIA’s preferred route is consensus: a universally accepted method of “hot” measurement that closes any theoretical loophole without formally amending the regulations.

Trust, Data and Quiet Alliances

Recent technical talks reportedly produced partial agreement on guiding principles, but not universal support. Only a subset of manufacturers are said to be fully aligned, with Ferrari, Audi and Honda known to have coordinated their stance through prior correspondence with the governing body.

Ferrari engine technical director Enrico Gualtieri has struck a measured tone amid the tension, emphasizing process over confrontation.

"We are still discussing with them [the FIA]," he said last month, quoted by The Race.

"We had a meeting, a technical workshop and we are going to have an additional one in the next days, up to the [next] PUAC meeting.

"So we are approaching the topic together with them [the FIA]. We are certainly trusting them for managing the topic in the proper way, going through the procedures and the governance that is in place by regulation. And we completely trust that the process could come in the next days and weeks."

Gualtieri’s words project calm, but the subtext is unmistakable: this is a delicate balancing act between technical fairness and political reality. Any adjustment perceived to disadvantage Mercedes or Red Bull is unlikely to gain their blessing.

So the question lingers – will consensus prevail, or will rival teams escalate matters with formal protests once engines hit the track?

In a championship where thousandths of a second define glory and obscurity, even the temperature at which a ratio is measured can become a battlefield.

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via X and Facebook

Phillip van Osten

Motor racing was a backdrop from the outset in Phillip van Osten's life. Born in Southern California, Phillip grew up with the sights and sounds of fast cars thanks to his father, Dick van Osten, an editor and writer for Auto Speed and Sport and Motor Trend. Phillip's passion for racing grew even more when his family moved to Europe and he became acquainted with the extraordinary world of Grand Prix racing. He was an early contributor to the monthly French F1i Magazine, often providing a historic or business perspective on Formula 1's affairs. In 2012, he co-authored along with fellow journalist Pierre Van Vliet the English-language adaptation of a limited edition book devoted to the great Belgian driver Jacky Ickx. He also authored "The American Legacy in Formula 1", a book which recounts the trials and tribulations of American drivers in Grand Prix racing. Phillip is also a commentator for Belgian broadcaster Be.TV for the US Indycar series.

Recent Posts

A tribute to a talented fallen F1 hopeful

Roger Williamson - the young British F1 hopeful who was lost to motorsport in a…

7 mins ago

Russell confident in Mercedes W17 – but stops short of title claim

Mercedes’ George Russell is currently the bookmakers’ favorite for the 2026 F1 world title, yet…

56 mins ago

Brundle fears less 'raw racing’ with new-era F1 cars

Formula 1 may be charging toward its most electrified future yet, but Sky F1's Martin…

3 hours ago

‘Gloves off’: Red Bull would love freer F1 engine development

Red Bull Powertrains technical director Ben Hodgkinson has made it clear he would rather see…

5 hours ago

Cadillac to move from reliability to speed in Bahrain – Lowdon

After a careful shakedown in Barcelona, Cadillac team principal Graeme Lowdon has confirmed that the…

21 hours ago

Aston Martin insider says Newey-led AMR26 is ‘on another level’

Aston Martin’s 2026 challenger hasn’t turned a competitive wheel in anger yet, but inside the…

23 hours ago