Brown: Engine compression ratio row just ‘typical politics of F1’

Zak Brown has poured cold water on Formula 1’s latest technical firestorm, dismissing the swelling controversy over compression ratios and Mercedes power units as nothing more than the sport’s usual political theatre — loud, dramatic, and entirely predictable.

The McLaren CEO finds himself at the center of a swirling rumor mill that hasn’t even waited for the first green light of the new era before spinning into overdrive.

With Formula 1’s sweeping 2026 engine regulations looming, whispers have suggested Mercedes may have uncovered a clever loophole involving compression ratios.

The gossip has snowballed so aggressively that some corners of the paddock even floated the idea of Mercedes-powered cars – which include McLaren – being declared non-compliant by the FIA and missing the Australian Grand Prix season opener.

Brown, however, appears utterly unmoved by the noise.

‘Typical Politics’ in Overdrive

For Brown, the uproar isn’t a scandal – it’s a familiar script. In a sport where technical ingenuity and political gamesmanship share equal billing, he sees the current wrangling as business as usual.

“It’s typical politics of Formula 1,” the McLaren chief told the media recently.

The technical debate centers on the new 16:1 compression ratio ceiling mandated for the next generation of power units, down from the 18:1 permitted in the turbo-hybrid era.

Enforcement is intended through parc fermé checks conducted at ambient temperatures. The alleged loophole? Materials that subtly expand under race heat, potentially allowing engines to operate closer to 18:1 once on track without technically breaching the letter of the law.

If true, it would represent a legal engineering masterstroke – and an immediate competitive flashpoint. Rival teams have been quick to raise alarms, but Brown frames innovation within the regulations as the very DNA of Formula 1.

“The engine has been designed and totally compliant within the rules,” he added. “That’s what the sport is about. [This case is] no different to things like double diffusers that we’ve seen in the past, where they’re compliant within the rules.”

In Brown’s view, this is less about fairness and more about familiarity: Formula 1 has always rewarded those who read the rulebook with a magnifying glass.

Advantage or Alarmism?

While competitors warn of an impending imbalance, Brown suggests the perceived edge is being amplified for strategic leverage rather than technical reality.

“I don’t believe there’s a significant advantage as being represented by the competition,” the American said. “But of course their job is any perceived advantage, they’ll make some story out of it.”

Behind the scenes, lobbying efforts are reportedly intensifying. Ideas range from installing real-time compression sensors to having the FIA inspect engines under simulated race conditions.

Yet an immediate rule change would require near-unanimous agreement among power-unit manufacturers alongside FIA and Formula 1 approval – a political hill steeper than the technical one currently under debate.

Read also:

• Thermal warfare: F1 rivals unite to melt Mercedes’ engine edge

For Brown, the key point is straightforward: the Mercedes engine program has passed scrutiny and remains within the framework provided.

“But the reality is the engine is completely compliant, passed all its tests, and I think HPP [Mercedes High Performance Powertrains] has done a good job,” he added.

Melbourne Grid Fears? Not From Brown

Perhaps the most sensational rumor to emerge suggested Mercedes-powered teams – including McLaren – could be forced to sit out the Australian season opener if the issue escalated. Brown treats that theory as paddock fiction rather than plausible outcome.

“I can’t imagine that you wouldn’t have Mercedes teams on the grid in Australia,” he asserted.

“We’re not privy to those conversations and so I wouldn’t even know from a power unit point of view what would be required to change the regulations.

“But we’ll have all the Mercedes teams on the grid in Australia, I’m sure.”

In a championship where loopholes are hunted as fiercely as lap time, Brown’s message is clear: the compression ratio controversy may be today’s headline, but in Formula 1, political turbulence is practically a pre-season ritual – noisy, dramatic, and rarely the apocalypse it first appears to be.

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via X and Facebook