F1 Technical Insight

Tech F1i Monza - Haas' Italian job fails the rules

THE BOTTOM LINE... AND CORNER

Haas and Renault are fighting for fourth place in the constructors’ standings. The performances of the RS18 and the VF-18 are very close, and each team carefully scrutinizes the evolution of their rivals’ car, on the lookout for an opportunity to copy... or an irregularity to denounce.

Two hours after the end of the race, Renault filed a complaint with the FIA against the Haas of Romain Grosjean for non-compliance with Article 3.7.1 of the technical regulations. According to item d) of this article, the two upper corners of the floor (i.e. the corners of the “splitter” or “T-tray“) must “have a 50 mm radius (+/-2 mm) on each front corner when viewed from directly beneath the car, this being applied after the surface has been defined”.

In other words, the corners cannot be square but should instead be slightly rounded. This is observed in the images below, which show the roundness of floors on the Ferrari and the Mercedes.

During the season, however, it appeared that all the teams had not interpreted Article 3.7.1 in the same way. This is why the FIA issued a technical directive (TD/033-18) on July 25 clarifying the regulations and asking the teams to put their floor in compliance for the Italian Grand Prix.

 HAAS DOESN’T CUT CORNERS

As we can see in the above image of the VF-18 taken at Monza, the corners of the “T-tray” itself are actually square (see the red arrows), and have been since an evolution introduced at the Canadian Grand Prix. A “bend” is certainly visible (white arrows), but is located on the “bargeboard“, not on the flat bottom stricto sensu, where the edges are straight. This was the bone of contention, and it involves a crucial part of the air flow under the car.

After the release of the directive, Haas asked the FIA for additional time to comply (until the Singapore Grand Prix), citing the summer break and the time it took for suppliers to produce new parts. Moreover, in its view, the Directive was ambiguous as to the definition of the “T-tray“, which made its application impossible. The team thus decided to race in Monza with the flat bottom that did not comply.

The stewards, however, felt that the directive was binding and that Haas had not respected it. They also motivated their decision by the fact that another team – also called into question – was able to get its "bottom" in order within the time limit. Haas decided to appeal the decision.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Nicolas Carpentiers

Nicolas Carpentiers is F1i.com's resident technical expert, providing in-depth technical analysis and casting his critical eye across the developments of the teams throughout the season.

Recent Posts

Formula 1 stakeholders approve major energy rule adjustments

Formula 1 has moved swiftly to address growing concerns over its 2026 regulations, with the…

13 hours ago

Wolff sounds alarm over ADUO “gamesmanship” risk

Toto Wolff isn’t raising the red flag lightly – but when it comes to Formula…

15 hours ago

‘He has not got the patience’: Steiner questions Stroll’s F1 strategy

Aston Martin’s 2026 campaign in F1 has so far been a troublesome affair, and former…

16 hours ago

Nice guys do win F1 world championships

There's an old belief in motor racing that nice guys don't win world championships. This…

18 hours ago

Palou rolls on with perfect race in Long Beach

CGR’s Alex Palou extended his scorching hot streak in the NTT IndyCar Series on Sunday…

19 hours ago

Domenicali: Antonelli the ‘fresh blood’ Formula 1 and Italy need

For Formula 1 boss Stefano Domenicali, Kimi Antonelli represents something much larger than a mercurial…

20 hours ago