F1 Technical Insight

Tech F1i Monza - Haas' Italian job fails the rules

THE BOTTOM LINE... AND CORNER

Haas and Renault are fighting for fourth place in the constructors’ standings. The performances of the RS18 and the VF-18 are very close, and each team carefully scrutinizes the evolution of their rivals’ car, on the lookout for an opportunity to copy... or an irregularity to denounce.

Two hours after the end of the race, Renault filed a complaint with the FIA against the Haas of Romain Grosjean for non-compliance with Article 3.7.1 of the technical regulations. According to item d) of this article, the two upper corners of the floor (i.e. the corners of the “splitter” or “T-tray“) must “have a 50 mm radius (+/-2 mm) on each front corner when viewed from directly beneath the car, this being applied after the surface has been defined”.

In other words, the corners cannot be square but should instead be slightly rounded. This is observed in the images below, which show the roundness of floors on the Ferrari and the Mercedes.

During the season, however, it appeared that all the teams had not interpreted Article 3.7.1 in the same way. This is why the FIA issued a technical directive (TD/033-18) on July 25 clarifying the regulations and asking the teams to put their floor in compliance for the Italian Grand Prix.

 HAAS DOESN’T CUT CORNERS

As we can see in the above image of the VF-18 taken at Monza, the corners of the “T-tray” itself are actually square (see the red arrows), and have been since an evolution introduced at the Canadian Grand Prix. A “bend” is certainly visible (white arrows), but is located on the “bargeboard“, not on the flat bottom stricto sensu, where the edges are straight. This was the bone of contention, and it involves a crucial part of the air flow under the car.

After the release of the directive, Haas asked the FIA for additional time to comply (until the Singapore Grand Prix), citing the summer break and the time it took for suppliers to produce new parts. Moreover, in its view, the Directive was ambiguous as to the definition of the “T-tray“, which made its application impossible. The team thus decided to race in Monza with the flat bottom that did not comply.

The stewards, however, felt that the directive was binding and that Haas had not respected it. They also motivated their decision by the fact that another team – also called into question – was able to get its "bottom" in order within the time limit. Haas decided to appeal the decision.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Nicolas Carpentiers

Nicolas Carpentiers is F1i.com's resident technical expert, providing in-depth technical analysis and casting his critical eye across the developments of the teams throughout the season.

Recent Posts

Norris: Miami ‘not the track’ to judge McLaren upgrades

Lando Norris says Miami isn’t the best circuit to gauge the full impact of McLaren’s…

43 mins ago

Red Bull’s Mintzlaff publicly backs ‘very good CEO’ Horner

Red Bull managing director Oliver Mintzlaff has for the very first time publicly expressed his…

2 hours ago

Alonso to talk to FIA about nationality bias in F1 penalty decisions

Fernando Alonso says he’ll be looking to engage with the FIA regarding his concerns over…

4 hours ago

Imola 1985: When Prost was too light to win

On this day in 1985, the San Marino Grand Prix ended in confusion with drivers…

5 hours ago

Miami Speed Trap: Who is the fastest of them all?

As a street-track spectacular, the Miami International Autodrome features three long straights and an equal…

6 hours ago

Stella: Magnussen defensive tactics ‘unacceptable’ – must be addressed

McLaren team boss Andrea Stella has strongly condemned Kevin Magnussen's defensive tactics during the Miami…

7 hours ago