F1 News, Reports and Race Results

Verstappen 'disappointed' by FIA intervention on porpoising

Reigning F1 world champion Max Verstappen calls the FIA's in-season intervention on porpoising "a bit of a shame" given how some teams have mastered the problem.

Ahead of this weekend's Canadian Grand Prix, the FIA released a technical directive outlining a series of measures aimed at reducing and eventually eliminating the vertical oscillation suffered by a majority of F1's new generation cars.

In Baku, several drivers, including Mercedes' George Russell and Lewis Hamilton, denounced their car's bouncing and bottoming and the potential physical consequences generated by the phenomenon.

Red Bull's RB18 is among the rare cars in the field that isn't impacted by the problem, nor should it be by the governing body's latest directive.

But Verstappen still feels that the FIA's intervention is unjust.

"I think it’s a bit disappointing that again there is a rule change mid-season, I would say," said Verstappen, quoted by RACER.

"It’s not even about affecting us more or less than other teams, but it shouldn’t be that one team is complaining a lot and suddenly then they change the regs around it.

"I think there are a lot of teams that actually did an amazing job to not have these kind of issues, so it is possible to drive around it.

"If you raise your car then you won’t have these issues, but you lose performance. But if you can’t design the car properly for that then that’s your fault, it’s not the regs fault. For me that is a bit of a shame."

Haas team boss Guenther Steiner says the FIA's directive, and the measures it will eventually enforce, could have a significant impact on F1's pecking order.

"Some of the cars are pretty bad," said the Haas boss. "And there is a solution — just raise the ride height. But then you go slow … who wants to go slow?

"It’s like I don’t know how many years ago, in the middle of the season when we had the change of tyres. It’s something like this.

"You change something fundamentally, you could change the pecking order completely again. Is that really fair? No. The use of the safety factor… but that could be approached, too — if it is too dangerous, just raise your ride height.

"The measurement with this is to find where it is dangerous, find the limit of something, if you are above this threshold… I don’t know what penalty you could give. It’s pretty fresh, this thing."

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Michael Delaney

Recent Posts

Alboreto delivers to Uncle Ken his last F1 win

Michele Alboreto scored an unexpected victory on this day in 1983, winning the Detroit Grand…

1 hour ago

A thousand grids, one legacy: McLaren’s legends reclaim Monaco

A bridge across generations stood on the iconic Monaco grid this Thursday as McLaren’s past…

2 hours ago

Russell resets F1 title ambitions with ‘nothing to lose’ outlook

After the rollercoaster and heartbreak that was Montreal last time out, George Russell has chosen…

3 hours ago

Formula 1 extends Las Vegas Grand Prix deal through 2037

Just three years after its return to the championship calendar, Formula 1 has confirmed that…

4 hours ago

Monaco active aero ban sparks fresh wave of F1 innovation

Formula 1's engineers are rarely known for leaving performance opportunities untouched, and Monaco's unique regulatory…

5 hours ago

Antonelli reminds Mercedes: ‘You can’t put a leash on a driver’

Kimi Antonelli is learning quickly that leading a Formula 1 championship at Mercedes comes with…

19 hours ago