Mercedes far from being exhausted

Both Silver Arrows flew by like shooting stars in Melbourne, with the first non-Mercedes car of Sebastian Vettel finishing 34.523s adrift of race winner Lewis Hamilton in his W06 Hybrid. This means an extra ten seconds compared to last year’s gap of 24.525s between Australian Grand Prix victor Nico Rosberg and second-placed Daniel Ricciardo (although the Aussie would eventually be disqualified).

Mercedes’ 2015 challenger is very good aerodynamically through fast corners – even though this comes at the expense of the car’s top-end speed – but the W06 also benefits from an upgraded PU106A power unit. Indeed, the engine technicians at Brixworth have used up more development tokens (25) than their counterparts at Ferrari (22) and Renault (20).

One change is particularly noticeable on the German behemoth’s 2015-spec power unit. It no longer features its distinctive log manifold, which used to be one the most distinguishing element on last year’s package. On each side of the V6, a single open pipe placed very close to the engine would collect the gases that were burnt in the three cylinders before feeding them towards the turbine via exhausts ducts. This year, Mercedes engine boss Andy Cowell and his team at High Performance Powertrains have gone for a more conventional manifold design: each cylinder has its own exhaust, with the three pipes then merging into the collector.

BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS

Each solution has its own advantages. The log-style exhaust is quite short, which helps prevent exhaust gases from losing too much pressure on exit. This also means that more energy is consequently fed towards the turbine, and then harvested by the MGU-H. However, engineers have to keep an eye for any potential collisions between the different gas molecules, which in turn might create turbulences. Last but not least, the compactness of the log manifold package offers great reliability while also giving more freedom to aerodynamicists.

On the other hand, the more conventional tubular exhaust systems have a longer size and thus lose some pressure at the turbo, but this design offers more leeway to regulate exhaust gases across all RPMs. By switching to a more traditional manifold, which seems to be implemented directly onto the engine, Mercedes somehow indicates that they have been able to find a way to maintain high pressure at the turbine. Would it be another masterstroke from Cowell and his team?

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Nicolas Carpentiers

Nicolas Carpentiers is F1i.com's resident technical expert, providing in-depth technical analysis and casting his critical eye across the developments of the teams throughout the season.

Recent Posts

‘Gloves off’: Red Bull would love freer F1 engine development

Red Bull Powertrains technical director Ben Hodgkinson has made it clear he would rather see…

1 hour ago

Cadillac to move from reliability to speed in Bahrain – Lowdon

After a careful shakedown in Barcelona, Cadillac team principal Graeme Lowdon has confirmed that the…

18 hours ago

Aston Martin insider says Newey-led AMR26 is ‘on another level’

Aston Martin’s 2026 challenger hasn’t turned a competitive wheel in anger yet, but inside the…

19 hours ago

Horner breaks silence: ‘I have unfinished business in F1’

Christian Horner has finally stepped back into the spotlight – and he didn’t tiptoe in…

22 hours ago

Jaguar's Evans charges from zero to hero in in Miami E-Prix

Mitch Evans arrived at Round 3 of the Formula E season with zero points on…

23 hours ago

Mercedes ‘aced it’ in Barcelona, but Brundle downplays the hype

Mercedes may have just dropped the first thunderclap of the 2026 Formula 1 era –…

24 hours ago